EA does not care about people who are not investors. Eliminating Kaepernick's name from tunes in Madden 2 years in a row reveals it. Companies do not need you to defend themlet their lawyers do that work. But we should not praise a company for Madden 21 coins reaching the absolute bare minimum. You aren't cool and ethical for thanking corporations for not spitting on you. We should praise companies who show patterns of positivity. Feel free to disagree, but don't act like this exact instance is this incredibly complicated morally-grey situation. I mean I believed there were fairly strict regulations whose titles and likeliness can be utilized in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Payton aren't in Madden since they are not a part of the NFLCA and that is who EA includes a contract with. They might have to cover Kap if his name is utilized and are likely avoiding that. That and Kap is not exactly welcome in the NFL world (not talking about lovers ) anymore.
They both backpeddled and apologized if they have been called out. They don't have rights to Kap's likeness from the game but they can mention him in the song (as they have plenty of other people characters in different songs). The fact that they did so two years in a row suggests it wasn't an innocent oversight but a genuine choice to collaborate with a essentially racist act of collusion within the NFL. I am not defending a provider. I'm not saying EA is some bastion of social justice. Most people in general (not just reddit) can't see beyond black and white. That's why negativity floats to the top in most societal media. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires more clicks. This is a major factor. Youtube for one has completed research, because it's a huge part of their company and they would like to understand it. There has been testimony to congress about it that I've watched but can not find at this time. What they want is participation and the more negatively styled something is the more folks will click it as it comes up on your recommendations.
Businesses don't need you to defend themlet their attorneys do this work. "Companies don't need you to defend them", but somehow attacking companies when they are doing the proper thing is necessary and productive?It does not matter if it's for PR reasons, they are still raising awareness to this problem and hurting nobody by doing this procedure. Meanwhile the men and women who see this as an chance to attack are only perpetuating a negative atmosphere of continuous whining. It is not so much about"protecting businesses" but about assaulting this naturally negativity. So you are really just adding to the man's debate by doing precisely what he described. They're not doing anything though. They just released a statement full of empty rhetoric. You understand what doing some thing is? Not creating another Madden game because the NFL punished players like Kaepernick for taking a knee. That would be impressive. However, we all know that's not what is going to occur.
The simple fact that folks here are really behaving like this is a meaningful gesture is indeed fucking baffling. EA literally went out of its way to scrub his title from their games two decades right, but this thread is making it look like they have donated millions. It's the definition of slacktivism. It'd be more honest if they had said nothing at all. I never mentioned"Let us attack a company for doing the right thing." My point, which I've tried to clarify in an edit, is that we should not PRAISE businesses for doing the bare minimum of human decency when they have shown in the past to be against what they're asserting. You can remain optimistic of matters looking up, which I often am. If your friend hurts your feelings, then they must regain your trust. You do not thank them every time from then on if they are being nice.
Wait, why not? If a buddy of mine hurt me and made an effort to be fine I would absolutely want to tell them I appreciate their efforts. Positive reinforcement is a great thing. It helps people behave better, who is to say it can't make a company behave better also? It's well worth rewarding them for it like it's worth rewarding a problem child for doing their best to get daily. The buy mut coins madden 21 difference is you positively reinforce ACTION, not words. EA (and people generally ) should not support black individuals for any reason beyond the fact that it's the correct thing to do. Benefits come from good behaviour, you should not be on good behavior for those benefits. Once I visit EA contribute to the causes or implement initiatives to help out black developers or items of this sort, then I will praise them. We just should require a higher standard and quit permitting firms off the hook so easily. I'm of the mindset that cancel culture is mostly poor and people should be encouraged to alter and enhance. But we shouldn't let ourselves to be played by companies that are, at the close of the day, looking to remove all barriers in the means of getting our cash. I've been burnt by false promises a lot of times.
